[SMM Analysis] Sulfur Special Series - Supply: Russia

Published: Dec 8, 2025 13:58
Source: SMM
[SMM Analysis] Sulfur Special Series - Supply: Russia

The development history of Russia's sulphur industry can be traced back to the Soviet era. As early as 1939, Russia began producing contact process sulphuric acid, marking the start of its modern sulphur chemical industry. After decades of development, Russia has established a complete sulphur production system, forming an integrated industry chain from raw material extraction to deep processing.

As the world's second-largest sulphur producer, Russia was once crucial in global sulphur trade. Its sulphur mainly served as a by-product of oil and gas processing, with annual production consistently around 5.6 million mt, most of which was used for exports. However, between 2022-2025, it experienced a yearly deepening from policy restrictions, production shrinkage to near-supply chain disruption, transforming Russia from a major net exporter with annual exports reaching 3.9 million mt (in 2019) into a net importer.

In terms of sulphur sources, 90% comes from gas fields, 6% from sulphide ores, and 4% from native sulphur. The main sources of sulphur include natural gas associated gas recovery, petroleum refining by-products, and non-ferrous metal smelting. Among these, natural gas associated gas recovery is the most important source, especially in large gas fields such as Astrakhan and Orenburg.

Since the outbreak of conflict in February 2022, Russia's refining system, railway transportation network, and international trade routes have been continuously hit, collectively leading to a sharp decline in its sulphur production and a fundamental reversal of its export pattern.


In 2022, despite the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, sulphur production was not significantly affected, but logistics began to be obstructed.

Refineries and transportation: In the early stages of the conflict, refineries were not the primary targets, but Black Sea maritime logistics were substantially blocked, forcing more reliance on rail transport. As sanctions intensified and production facilities came under threat, Russia began to realize the need to establish certain strategic reserves to ensure food and production security. In August 2022, the Russian Federation government imposed temporary export quotas on certain sulphur products.

Sanctions impact: A dense wave of Western sanctions was introduced, with over 92% of sanctions against Russia implemented after February 2022, aimed at comprehensively restricting the Russian economy.


In 2023, the impact of the conflict expanded, affecting both production and transportation. Due to Western sanctions, Russia's export destinations shifted.

Refineries and transportation: Ukraine started using drones to attack energy facilities deep within Russia. The railway system, taking on more transportation tasks and affected by early sanctions, began to come under pressure, with freight volumes declining. For the first time, there was a significant downward trend in Russian railway freight volume.

Sanctions impact: The EU's ban on Russian oil products took effect, directly impacting the revenue and operations of Russia's refining industry. Sanctions continued to escalate, with the EU imposing an embargo and price cap on Russian petroleum products. Russia shifted towards Asian markets, increasing exports to China, India, Southeast Asia, and other Asian countries. Customs data showed that, affected by geopolitical factors and fluctuations in international logistics costs, Russia's sulfur exports to China grew significantly after 2022, reaching 1.5 million mt in 2023.


In 2024, the conflict significantly impacted production, and Russia's trade situation deteriorated.

Refineries and Transportation: Attacks became a systemic issue. According to statistics, about 30 large refineries were attacked, resulting in the loss of approximately 10% (25 million to 30 million mt/year) of refining capacity. Railway freight volume decreased by 7.1% YoY, with key materials such as construction materials and metals experiencing declines exceeding 15%.

Impact of Sanctions: The dual effects of sanctions and attacks began to show in export data, with Russia's total fuel exports decreasing by 9.1% YoY. After more than two years of sanctions, Russian sulfur exports faced increasing obstacles, including difficulties in payment settlements, shortages of transport vessels, and insurance refusals.


2025: Sulfur production decreased substantially, and Russia transitioned from a net exporter to a net importer.

Refineries and Transportation: Attack intensity peaked. In H1, refineries in Ryazan and other locations were repeatedly attacked; by the end of September, up to 38% of primary processing capacity (approximately 338,000 mt/day) was idled, 70% of which was caused by drone attacks. The railway system continued to experience capacity shrinkage due to component shortages caused by sanctions and labor conscription.

Impact of Sanctions: EU sanctions in 2025 once involved Russia's key export port, Ust-Luga. Although exemptions were later granted for fertilizer raw materials like sulfur, this increased trade uncertainty and compliance costs. By June 2025, the total number of sanctions against Russia exceeded 30,000.

In October 2025, Russia made its first import, purchasing 35,000 mt of sulfur from abroad at a price of $390 per mt. This marked Russia's first large-scale sulfur import in many years, signaling the end of its era of sulfur self-sufficiency. It is estimated that Russia will need to import an additional approximately 1 million mt of sulfur annually to cover the domestic supply gap.


In summary, Russia has transitioned from a sulfur supplier to a sulfur demander in global trade, leading to a contraction in the supply side of international sulfur trade. Due to the ongoing conflict and equipment repairs, this is expected to have a long-term impact on sulfur supply for at least three years.

Data Source Statement: Except for publicly available information, all other data are processed by SMM based on publicly available information, market communication, and relying on SMM‘s internal database model. They are for reference only and do not constitute decision-making recommendations.

For any inquiries or to learn more information, please contact: lemonzhao@smm.cn
For more information on how to access our research reports, please contact:service.en@smm.cn
Related News
High-Grade NPI Smelter Profits Squeezed as Ore Prices Rise and Sales Prices Dip
8 hours ago
High-Grade NPI Smelter Profits Squeezed as Ore Prices Rise and Sales Prices Dip
Read More
High-Grade NPI Smelter Profits Squeezed as Ore Prices Rise and Sales Prices Dip
High-Grade NPI Smelter Profits Squeezed as Ore Prices Rise and Sales Prices Dip
[SMM Nickel Flash] Based on nickel ore prices from 25 days ago, smelter profits for high-grade NPI remained high this week. However, from the current raw material side, ore prices from both the Philippines and Indonesia increased, while auxiliary material prices saw a slight pullback, leading to an increase in the cash cost of producing high-grade NPI from spot ore. At the same time, high-grade NPI prices experienced some pullback, making it difficult for smelter profits to see sustained improvement.
8 hours ago
High-Grade NPI Prices Fall, Expected to Stabilize as Chinese New Year Approaches
8 hours ago
High-Grade NPI Prices Fall, Expected to Stabilize as Chinese New Year Approaches
Read More
High-Grade NPI Prices Fall, Expected to Stabilize as Chinese New Year Approaches
High-Grade NPI Prices Fall, Expected to Stabilize as Chinese New Year Approaches
[SMM Nickel Flash] This week, due to a sharp decline in futures triggering arbitrage selling, high-grade NPI prices fell significantly. However, after the selling activity subsided, upstream quotations and the market center gradually returned to normal levels, supported by cost factors. Looking ahead, as the Chinese New Year holiday approaches, market activity is expected to remain subdued, and high-grade NPI prices are projected to hover at highs with limited fluctuations.
8 hours ago
Nickel Prices Drop: SMM 10-12% High-Grade NPI Down 17.2 Yuan, Indonesia NPI FOB Index Falls 2.06 $/mtu
9 hours ago
Nickel Prices Drop: SMM 10-12% High-Grade NPI Down 17.2 Yuan, Indonesia NPI FOB Index Falls 2.06 $/mtu
Read More
Nickel Prices Drop: SMM 10-12% High-Grade NPI Down 17.2 Yuan, Indonesia NPI FOB Index Falls 2.06 $/mtu
Nickel Prices Drop: SMM 10-12% High-Grade NPI Down 17.2 Yuan, Indonesia NPI FOB Index Falls 2.06 $/mtu
[SMM Nickel Flash] The SMM average price of 10-12% high-grade NPI fell 17.2 yuan/mtu WoW to 1,035.8 yuan/mtu (ex-factory, tax included), while the Indonesia NPI FOB index average price dropped 2.06 $/mtu WoW to 131.2 $/mtu. At the beginning of the week, futures hit limit-down, and nickel prices fell sharply WoW, driving the emergence of arbitrage supplies sold at low prices, leading to a significant decline in high-grade NPI prices.
9 hours ago